Posted by
bunfight on Saturday, February 10, 2007 10:25:58 AM

That picture you see is of Dimveer Gill a 25 year old that went on a shooting spree in Montreal Canada. Someone certainly worthy of our contempt. The rifle he is holding is a Beretta CX4 Storm 9mm and is a restricted weapon in that country. The anti-gun movement now want all semi-automatic weapons banned. The mother of the young lady that was killed has directed her anger squarely on the gun the killer is holding rather than the killer. I pray that God will ease her grief and I think the anger she expresses is more than understandable and likely far more controlled than mine would be were I in her situation., However, I am certain that my anger would be directed squarely on the killer and the family that raised him.
You may recall a similar event in Montreal several years ago that was the catalyst behind Canada's gun control legislation. The thing that strikes me in these events is how in the rage that followed politicians, reporters and family could seem to only focus on the gun and not the killer. Even in the column in the National Post where this picture comes from, the reporter and the people inteviewed appear to be only able to see the gun and seem to relegate the killer to the status of a victim of this terrible piece of hardware. The belief being that with out the hardware the killer would simply have gone on with his life leaving everyone else alone. We know that is not true.
In all of these situations intent is a key factor and Gill had the intent. His next task was to simply look for the means. With other evil people like Gill their selection of means sometimes is to single out an individual, stalk, capture and kill out of sight rather than to do a frontal assault like Gill and Lepine. The terrorist that drove his car into college students had intent and the means he selected was the vehicle rather than a gun. It fit his ability to aquire the means and gave him the capability to carry out his intent. Timothy McVeigh had intent and his means was a rental truck and fertilizer.
Imposing restrictions on society at large will not remove the killers from the street. When intent matches means the result will always be the same. It is also impossible to understand why people keep trying to build a correlation between gun ownership and hunting. That is like building a correlation between vehicle ownership and commuting. Both are silly arguments and would not have stopped the crimes outlined above.
Even with tight gun control in place Toronto, Canada is simply bristling with guns. Unfortunately for the peace loving Canadians, and thanks to the gun ban passion of their Mayor, the guns are all in the hands of the gangs that terrorize Toronto's streets. After the christmas shooting of the young girl in an upscale store in downtown Toronto the Mayor of that city said that this could all have been prevented if only the US would impose tighter gun control legilstaion. Well Mr. Mayor your country is a shining example to the world of how restrictions imposed on law abiding citizens will not remove the intent of the killers. Violent crime is as common as snowflakes in most Canadian cities. The same holds true for England and Australia. Attempts to restrict weapons has done nothing to remove intent from segments of the population and just in case any of you get the wild idea that back ground checks would have been helpful, Gill purchased his weapon legally.
Bombs, guns, knives, axes, clubs, ropes, vehicles, poison, hands, feet, sticks, stones, lamps, drowning, cement shoes, etc. an endless list almost and in the mindset of the people in gun ban countries all worthy of restriction. Silly isn't it. We all know, though won't admit, that intent is the real killer and killers with intent will always find the means regardless whether it is a wife running over her cheating husband with her car or the DC Sniper.